I think it is a generally wise thing for Spyderco not to become to involved in a "this is too expensive" debate with customers when the only answer they can basically give is "we have reasons in the background," which is often true. I have some business experience making software and know how things in the background effect what reaches the customer. Otherwise the answer is that Spyderco does not think that it is too expensive for the market, which they legitimately could say, but wouldn't really benefit anyone.Mystery Flavor wrote: ↑Wed Nov 02, 2022 1:22 pmOne thing is for sure: the coming price increases (and insanely high starting prices on some new models) are not sustainable for the average buyer. A breaking point WILL occur where spyderco will start to permanently lose a large chunk of their loyal fans. You can only push people so far before they turn their backs on the company entirely.
However, I do believe it would be wise for Spyderco to consider that they do have a loyal fan base rooted in user knives that don't need super steels and would rather see more affordable products.
Still they are balancing so many factors that we can't evaluate, and they have employees who need to make a living too. Maybe they could stop printing catalogs, but for all I know those catalogs get people interested and bring in business, so that is their call.
There is a lot that Spyderco has to factor in, and we are never going to agree with every decision they make, nor are we going to be aware of every reason they make them.
But if my opinion is of any relevance, I would rather see more basic steels used to keep prices down, especially in USA made models, than I would see higher end steels in endless sprint runs. Effective for Spyderco as a business, I can't say, just my preference, which I would like to respectfully voice.
These are just my musings, food for thought.