Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
I voted option 1, because as a mechanical engineer it theoretically bothers me to have a 60-62 HRC steel to ~40 HRC Ti direct contact point that has precise dimensional requirements as well as the potential for reasonably high bearing stress and wear (particularly in the hard use and "knives as fidget toys" crowds). Add in the fact that Ti has a propensity to gall, and I just don't think it's the right way to do things. However, it is a lower cost way to do things, and like steel slides on aluminum pistol frames, Ti lock bars do seem to work alright most of the time. I haven't really had any issues with my Chokwe other than it being a little sticky, but a proper steel insert would be a requirement on a top end knife for me.
As for the corrosion issue, I believe Quiet Carry uses an LC200N insert in their Drift as the contact point for the Vanax blade. Obviously a much more expensive solution, but probably better, and still effectively corrosion proof in almost all realistic scenarios.
As for the corrosion issue, I believe Quiet Carry uses an LC200N insert in their Drift as the contact point for the Vanax blade. Obviously a much more expensive solution, but probably better, and still effectively corrosion proof in almost all realistic scenarios.
-
- Member
- Posts: 5858
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:01 pm
- Location: Missouri, USA
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
It's certainly possible to get vertical blade play in that scenario. Once the lockbar has traveled as far as it can go against the opposite scale, there remains no more room to wedge against the blade anymore. If the pivot/stop pin wears or wiggles in any way there will be blade play.wrdwrght wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 6:17 pmI didn’t vote, because I have questions.
I have yet to experience a ruined lock-face. None of my RILs has an insert. My Tusk and Techno2 are at 55% and my SpydieChef is at 80%, but my Sage2 (which I carried exclusively for over a year) is at 95%! :eek:
So, some naive questions.
When a lock-bar reaches 100%, does it want to proceed beyond, say across the space created by a washer? Once the lock-bar finally hits resistance on the opposite “scale”, will the blade remain tight or will it proceed to get vertical play?
If it remains tight, how then is the lock-face ruined?
As long as it remains tight, I don't think it'd be ruined in any sense. But it won't be able to take any additional wear without strting to introduce blade play.
Again, if there is some flex in the pivot or stop pin you will get vertical play since the lockface isn't wedging tightly against the blade anymore.If lock-rock ensues, how can it occur if the lock-face and the blade no longer rub when deploying, thus reaching a kind of equilibrium?
I should add that I do have a linerlock knife in which the lockbar, after years of use, has traveled all the way to the opposite scale. It's got some vertical blade play because of this.
- Connor
"What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"
"What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"
- JacksonKnives
- Member
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:28 pm
- Location: Alberta, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
IME, replacing the stop pin is far easier than replacing a lockbar insert on an old knife.wrdwrght wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 6:17 pmAgain, if there is some flex in the pivot or stop pin you will get vertical play since the lockface isn't wedging tightly against the blade anymore.If lock-rock ensues, how can it occur if the lock-face and the blade no longer rub when deploying, thus reaching a kind of equilibrium?
I should add that I do have a linerlock knife in which the lockbar, after years of use, has traveled all the way to the opposite scale. It's got some vertical blade play because of this.
I would happily take a small bag of spare inserts for my favourite knives, of course, but let's face it: no manufacturer offers replacement inserts.
Now, as to titanium wearing faster than the steel in the lockface... Sure, in theory.
But the only knives I own that have worn past 50% lockup (at which point IME it's a better-functioning lock and not something to complain about) are an early '90s linerlock with a steel liner (from another company) and a stainless-framelock Spyderco Cricket. I suspect that in either case replacing the stop pin would give me another 30 years of pleasurable use; even as they are they're still reliable.
- Abyss_Fish
- Member
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:23 pm
- Location: Minnesota, USA.
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
My spydiechef’s bar mushroomed out after about a year of use, and the blade started developing up and down play. I had to get the lock interface carbidized to keep the knife functioning any longer.
I won’t be buying a Ti framelock without any sort of lock interface again. Just like with Teflon washers or steel detent balls, there are simply better technologies and techniques available.
I won’t be buying a Ti framelock without any sort of lock interface again. Just like with Teflon washers or steel detent balls, there are simply better technologies and techniques available.
Lightly insane.
Current spydie collection: Watu, Rhino, UKPK Salt G10 bladeswap, Yojimbo 2 Smooth G10 Cru-Wear, Manix lw “mystic” 20cv, SmallFly 2, Waterway, Ladybug k390, Caribbean
Current favorite steels: sg2/R2, lc200n/Z-FiNit, 3v
Current spydie collection: Watu, Rhino, UKPK Salt G10 bladeswap, Yojimbo 2 Smooth G10 Cru-Wear, Manix lw “mystic” 20cv, SmallFly 2, Waterway, Ladybug k390, Caribbean
Current favorite steels: sg2/R2, lc200n/Z-FiNit, 3v
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
The Meat man wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 5:44 pmI was thinking about CRK when I made this thread. Those knives have been used and abused as you say for decades and I've never heard any complaints about lockface wear. Quite the contrary, as a matter of fact.
Even CRK uses ceramic balls now for their locks. They must believe it’s an improvement otherwise they wouldn’t have made the change.
Para 3 Maxamet | Para 3 CruWear DLC | Smock M4 Jade G-10 | Shaman Z-Wear Micarta | Salt 2 LC200N Wharnie | Chaparral Birdseye Maple | Lil’ Native S90V CF | Dragonfly 2 20CV | Ladybug K390 | CRK Small Sebenza 31 S45VN PJ
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
Everything about RILs:
viewtopic.php?t=63964
viewtopic.php?t=63964
Military/PM2/P3 Native Chief/Native GB2 DF2 PITS Chaparral Tasman Salt 2 SE Caribbean Sheepfoot SE SpydieChef Swayback Manix2 Sage 1 SSS Stretch 2 XL G10
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
Henry_P wrote: ↑Sat May 01, 2021 8:51 amThe Meat man wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 5:44 pmI was thinking about CRK when I made this thread. Those knives have been used and abused as you say for decades and I've never heard any complaints about lockface wear. Quite the contrary, as a matter of fact.
Even CRK uses ceramic balls now for their locks. They must believe it’s an improvement otherwise they wouldn’t have made the change.
Companies often do things simply because people demand it, or to cut production and warranty costs.
Military/PM2/P3 Native Chief/Native GB2 DF2 PITS Chaparral Tasman Salt 2 SE Caribbean Sheepfoot SE SpydieChef Swayback Manix2 Sage 1 SSS Stretch 2 XL G10
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
Well, yes. If you're going to flick open your knives with enough force to cause plastic deformation, you need a steel lock interface.Abyss_Fish wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 11:55 pmMy spydiechef’s bar mushroomed out after about a year of use, and the blade started developing up and down play. I had to get the lock interface carbidized to keep the knife functioning any longer.
I won’t be buying a Ti framelock without any sort of lock interface again. Just like with Teflon washers or steel detent balls, there are simply better technologies and techniques available.
And there's nothing wrong with Teflon washers. Just sayin'
- curlyhairedboy
- Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 11:01 am
- Location: Southern New England
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
I believe titanium - as a knife handle material - is mainly used for strength while maintaining relative lightness; in special cases it’s used for corrosion resistance.
I have personally worn out a Spyderco Southard frame lock without an insert to the point of significant lock rock, which on a frame lock I consider a failure mode of the locking mechanism.
That said, getting a lock interface right is tough, and titanium’s relative stickiness helps. There has been a trend in recent Taichung frame locks with inserts where the knives exhibit lock slip under gentle continuous closing pressure. This wasn’t an issue on older Taichung models with inserts like the mantra series, so it’s a newer development, hopefully remedied soon. I consider lock slip to also be a failure mode.
I’ve mostly switched over to compression locks for their durability and superior physical arrangement (long axis compression forces vs short axis compression forces).
I have personally worn out a Spyderco Southard frame lock without an insert to the point of significant lock rock, which on a frame lock I consider a failure mode of the locking mechanism.
That said, getting a lock interface right is tough, and titanium’s relative stickiness helps. There has been a trend in recent Taichung frame locks with inserts where the knives exhibit lock slip under gentle continuous closing pressure. This wasn’t an issue on older Taichung models with inserts like the mantra series, so it’s a newer development, hopefully remedied soon. I consider lock slip to also be a failure mode.
I’ve mostly switched over to compression locks for their durability and superior physical arrangement (long axis compression forces vs short axis compression forces).
EDC Rotation: PITS, Damasteel Urban, Shaman, Ikuchi, Amalgam, CruCarta Shaman, Sage 5 LW, Serrated Caribbean Sheepsfoot CQI, XHP Shaman, M4/Micarta Shaman, 15v Shaman
Fixed Blades: Proficient, Magnacut Mule
Special and Sentimental: Southard, Squarehead LW, Ouroboros, Calendar Para 3 LW, 40th Anniversary Native, Ti Native, Calendar Watu, Tanto PM2
Would like to own again: CQI Caribbean Sheepsfoot PE, Watu
Wishlist: Magnacut, Shaman Sprints!
Fixed Blades: Proficient, Magnacut Mule
Special and Sentimental: Southard, Squarehead LW, Ouroboros, Calendar Para 3 LW, 40th Anniversary Native, Ti Native, Calendar Watu, Tanto PM2
Would like to own again: CQI Caribbean Sheepsfoot PE, Watu
Wishlist: Magnacut, Shaman Sprints!
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
Hi Folks!
I'll begin saying I'm a big RIL fan. My 3 most used Spydies are the Techno, the Slysz Bowie and the Sage 2. Use them in rotation A Lot in the field and all are around 35-40% lock face.
But also have a couple of Sebenzas and another Hinderer trio, all of them 100% functional after years of heavy field use as well.
So, at least for me, the lock bar insert is a brilliant solution for a non existing problem, meaning my vote goes for I don't care about it :D
But since there's a lot of hype about it, and a huge bunch of so called influencers claiming for it well... last time I checked there's an Economic Law that clearly states that as long as there's demand someone will supply it... :rolleyes:
I'll begin saying I'm a big RIL fan. My 3 most used Spydies are the Techno, the Slysz Bowie and the Sage 2. Use them in rotation A Lot in the field and all are around 35-40% lock face.
But also have a couple of Sebenzas and another Hinderer trio, all of them 100% functional after years of heavy field use as well.
So, at least for me, the lock bar insert is a brilliant solution for a non existing problem, meaning my vote goes for I don't care about it :D
But since there's a lot of hype about it, and a huge bunch of so called influencers claiming for it well... last time I checked there's an Economic Law that clearly states that as long as there's demand someone will supply it... :rolleyes:
-
- Member
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:31 am
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
OK - late to the party here.
I'm considering a Spydiechef, which would be my first framelock. So in reading up on it, I ended up also reading a bit about lockstick, lockup, and lockbar inserts, so here I am.
Quick question on this - what about a titanium lockbar insert?
That way it would still be titanium for corrosion resistance, but if/when the lockbar insert wears down too much, you could just replace the insert.
Jason
I'm considering a Spydiechef, which would be my first framelock. So in reading up on it, I ended up also reading a bit about lockstick, lockup, and lockbar inserts, so here I am.
Quick question on this - what about a titanium lockbar insert?
That way it would still be titanium for corrosion resistance, but if/when the lockbar insert wears down too much, you could just replace the insert.
Jason
Jason
Current Rotation:
Pacific Salt 2 PE (H1)
Spydiechef
Stretch 2 (K390)
Chaparral LW
Dragonfly 2 Salt SE (Bonus 2nd blade!)
Current Rotation:
Pacific Salt 2 PE (H1)
Spydiechef
Stretch 2 (K390)
Chaparral LW
Dragonfly 2 Salt SE (Bonus 2nd blade!)
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
I say not if done right. The Ti lockbar can / should be hardened (HT just with a normal torch).
Military/PM2/P3 Native Chief/Native GB2 DF2 PITS Chaparral Tasman Salt 2 SE Caribbean Sheepfoot SE SpydieChef Swayback Manix2 Sage 1 SSS Stretch 2 XL G10
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
I’m in the process of acquiring means to carbidize my lock faces without inserts. My Chef is already well past 50 percent lockup, probably closer to 80. My southard isn’t but I’m sure will be in time.
I still don’t understand the resistance to this. I have seen no justification for this claiming that the lack of insert is superior in someway, just claims that it’s not necessary to have an insert. But in my own experience and seemingly those of many others it is simply superior construction that will give the knife a longer usable life and make it more likely to function properly during that life. I shouldn’t be having to modify knives in this price range that were acquired in the last two years in order for them to function properly in the long term. It can’t add that much cost. I repeat, I don’t understand the resistance.
I still don’t understand the resistance to this. I have seen no justification for this claiming that the lack of insert is superior in someway, just claims that it’s not necessary to have an insert. But in my own experience and seemingly those of many others it is simply superior construction that will give the knife a longer usable life and make it more likely to function properly during that life. I shouldn’t be having to modify knives in this price range that were acquired in the last two years in order for them to function properly in the long term. It can’t add that much cost. I repeat, I don’t understand the resistance.
Current Spyderco: Native 5 LW s35vn; Delica zdp; Caly 3.5 zdp/CF; Chapparel FRN cts xhp; Southard 204p; Kapara s30v; Ikuchi s30v; Spydiechef lc200n, Waterway Lc200n; Manix 2 LW 20cv
Past Spyderco: Endura zdp; Manix 2 LW s110v; Paramilitary 2 s30v
Past Spyderco: Endura zdp; Manix 2 LW s110v; Paramilitary 2 s30v
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
You can take my opinion on this with a grain of salt, because the only ti framelocks I own are CRKs, five, to be exact. Only one of them has the ceramic ball at the lockbar/blade tang interface.
Although I don't use it as often now, I extensively used my first Sebenza, bought new 19 years ago, for years, and TBH, the lockbar's position hasn't moved across any further at all than when it was new. I also used my 2015 Insingo 21 a lot, which hasn't moved across beyond about 50%, same as when it came out of the box. Neither has developed any blade play at all, either. I can't comment on the other three, because they haven't seen as much use.
I would never say no to lock bar inserts, because again, those CRKs are the only ti framelocks I own, or plan on owning. I would say that inserts would probably be an advantage on some companies' frame locks. But I really have no strong opinion one way or another.
Jim
Although I don't use it as often now, I extensively used my first Sebenza, bought new 19 years ago, for years, and TBH, the lockbar's position hasn't moved across any further at all than when it was new. I also used my 2015 Insingo 21 a lot, which hasn't moved across beyond about 50%, same as when it came out of the box. Neither has developed any blade play at all, either. I can't comment on the other three, because they haven't seen as much use.
I would never say no to lock bar inserts, because again, those CRKs are the only ti framelocks I own, or plan on owning. I would say that inserts would probably be an advantage on some companies' frame locks. But I really have no strong opinion one way or another.
Jim
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
Those Spydie-flicks might also mean more issues with lock stick since you're jamming the lock face into the tang with more force than if you opened the blade normally.
Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most!
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
I was just wondering about this. I'm pro-lock bar insert and think it's generally a good thing. But I've also never seen anyone say they had to send their knife in to have the lock bar insert changed. I'm sure it happens otherwise there would be no need to use the inserts in the first place.The Meat man wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 5:42 pmThat's a good point: steel inserts are generally replaceable.
Of course, there's the question of whether or not anyone has ever needed to replace one, but I agree better to have it and not need it than the other way around.
One feature I like about the lock bar inserts is that it's easier to change the detent ball if necessary
Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most!
-
- Member
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 9:05 am
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
Without arguing that a steel insert is preferable or not, I will say that I have never noticed the need for one on my knives that have titanium lockbars, namely a CRK and a Scott Cook Lochsa, both of which are users.
Re: Steel lockbar inserts: necessary or not?
LUV my CRK and Lochsa, too. Dunno about wear on the Lochsa (#11)) as I don't use it a lot. :D
No appreciable or noticeable wear on my CRK or SpydiecChef, either.
No appreciable or noticeable wear on my CRK or SpydiecChef, either.