Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
There has been some question about whether CATRA is a useful test for actually predicting the edge retention of a knife. After all, it is a test performed by a robot, not a human, and the knife cuts cardstock with sand in it, which doesn't seem like a very realistic material. So I took three big datasets where people reported their own rope cutting experiments, and then compared those with what we would expect a CATRA test to tell us. https://knifesteelnerds.com/2019/02/11/ ... rformance/
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
Re: Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
Your comparison/correlation with Ankerson's test in particular is spectacular, Larrin. Thanks for doing this !
- NickShabazz
- Member
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:48 am
- Contact:
Re: Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
This is wonderful, thanks for doing the math :)
Mourning the Slysz Bowie and loving the rest of Spyderco's gems. Check out my reviews at https://www.youtube.com/c/nickshabazz!
Re: Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
This really highlights edge retention being largely about stability. Low alloy steels with great geometries didn't do well, and super steels with sub-optimal geometries only did ok. Combine the two (along with hardness), and you have something impressive.
Re: Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
Yes, definitely can't look at only the steel type for predicting knife performance. Edge geometry is more important than steel.
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
Re: Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
True, it just has to be able to maintain that geometry. The AEB-L, while ground incredibly thin, did horribly. Thanks for another great article.
Re: Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
Thanks, Larrin! Jim Anderson must be pleased at the high correlation between his rope tests and the CATRA card tests. What edge finish is regulation for CATRA testing, toothy or polished? I seem to recall Jim writing that the 400 grit SiC edge outperformed a polished edge on rope.
Re: Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
There is no standard for CATRA. Coarse edges are probably more common.Bill1170 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:42 pmThanks, Larrin! Jim Anderson must be pleased at the high correlation between his rope tests and the CATRA card tests. What edge finish is regulation for CATRA testing, toothy or polished? I seem to recall Jim writing that the 400 grit SiC edge outperformed a polished edge on rope.
http://www.KnifeSteelNerds.com - Steel Metallurgy topics related to knives
Re: Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
Interesting. I guess that makes for good A/B testing opportunities, if one has CATRA access.Larrin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:18 pmThere is no standard for CATRA. Coarse edges are probably more common.Bill1170 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:42 pmThanks, Larrin! Jim Anderson must be pleased at the high correlation between his rope tests and the CATRA card tests. What edge finish is regulation for CATRA testing, toothy or polished? I seem to recall Jim writing that the 400 grit SiC edge outperformed a polished edge on rope.
-
- Member
- Posts: 5858
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:01 pm
- Location: Missouri, USA
Re: Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
Thank you Larrin! Very interesting to see how the various "informal" testing measured up with the CATRA testing. That is an impressive amount of data to work through.
- Connor
"What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"
"What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"
Re: Can CATRA Predict Rope Cutting Performance?
Another great study and read, Larrin.
In particular, I agree with your thoughts about LC200N. You said,
I'm equally stumped, but my experience with this steel is identical.
I would love to see more about LC200N (I've taken to calling it a "miracle" steel). Since I received a new SpydieChef, it has rocketed to the top of my favorite blade steels. This steel is incredibly easy to sharpen and resharpen/touch-up, yet its edge retention is coming in around the same as the march harder to sharpen CPM S35V. I don't know anything about its cost, but I would love to see Spyderco consider making this their "default" steel in place of using S30V. Again, I'm ignorant of the specifics, but I would posit that any slight cost increase in the metal would be made up by less wear and tear on their equipment in working with it. Plus, it doesn't rust (at least from every test I've seen)!
In particular, I agree with your thoughts about LC200N. You said,
"Steels that did better than expected based on the CATRA prediction include LC200N and CPM-M4. I don’t have a good explanation for the good performance of LC200N, which made about 230 cuts vs its predicted position at about 100 cuts."
I'm equally stumped, but my experience with this steel is identical.
I would love to see more about LC200N (I've taken to calling it a "miracle" steel). Since I received a new SpydieChef, it has rocketed to the top of my favorite blade steels. This steel is incredibly easy to sharpen and resharpen/touch-up, yet its edge retention is coming in around the same as the march harder to sharpen CPM S35V. I don't know anything about its cost, but I would love to see Spyderco consider making this their "default" steel in place of using S30V. Again, I'm ignorant of the specifics, but I would posit that any slight cost increase in the metal would be made up by less wear and tear on their equipment in working with it. Plus, it doesn't rust (at least from every test I've seen)!