Optimal hardness for 52100

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
sbaker345
Member
Posts: 310
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:32 pm

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#21

Post by sbaker345 »

I'll take number 6 Sal :D
User avatar
jabba359
Member
Posts: 4958
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: North Hollywood, CA U.S.A. Earth
Contact:

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#22

Post by jabba359 »

bearfacedkiller wrote:What was the mule run at? I have the 52100 mule and am happy with it's performance.
62.
-Kyle

:bug-red
Latest arrivals: Lava Flow CF DLC Para2, Magnacut Mule, GITD Jester

http://www.spydiewiki.com
User avatar
Mic1
Member
Posts: 479
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:17 am

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#23

Post by Mic1 »

I'm in for 1.
Bodog
Member
Posts: 1752
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:03 am
Location: Tierra del Sol, USA Earth

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#24

Post by Bodog »

A 52100 millie would be pretty cool. Anodized titanium would be nice looking with the patina that'll probably be on the blade. And another vote for a target of 62-63 RC.

This would be a great test knife to try some kind of different heat treatment process. It'd be a cool story to go with a cool knife. Most companies don't do anything to explain what they do to harden a blade, I think it'd make a very marketable knife if it had an edge-u-cation pamphlet explaining what was done differently.
They who dance are thought mad by those who do not hear the music.
User avatar
Liquid Cobra
Member
Posts: 6490
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:38 pm
Location: British Columbia, CANADA

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#25

Post by Liquid Cobra »

Sal, is the 52100 UKPK idea still on the table?
Most recently acquired: Military 2, Paramilitary 2 Tanto x2, YoJUMBO, Swayback, Siren, DLC Yojimbo 2, Native Chief, Shaman S90V, Para 3 LW, Ikuchi, UKPK, Smock, SUBVERT, Amalgam, Para 3 CTS-XHP, Kapara, Paramilitary 2 M390
Grail Paramilitary 2 M390 X 2! ACHIEVED!!

For more of my pictures see my Instagram account.
@liquid_cobra
User avatar
WireEdge Roger
Member
Posts: 926
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Indiana

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#26

Post by WireEdge Roger »

As a Military model collector, I'm definitely interested in this Sprint!

Thanks, Sal!
User avatar
Joris Mo
Member
Posts: 1099
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:51 am
Location: Amsterdam, NL.

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#27

Post by Joris Mo »

I'm in!! :D :D :D
User avatar
Wanimator
Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:40 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#28

Post by Wanimator »

62-63 sounds good, hard but not ultra hard. Too bad the Military is a righty knife otherwise... I'd have one...
sbaker345
Member
Posts: 310
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:32 pm

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#29

Post by sbaker345 »

Bodog wrote:A 52100 millie would be pretty cool. Anodized titanium would be nice looking with the patina that'll probably be on the blade. And another vote for a target of 62-63 RC.

This would be a great test knife to try some kind of different heat treatment process. It'd be a cool story to go with a cool knife. Most companies don't do anything to explain what they do to harden a blade, I think it'd make a very marketable knife if it had an edge-u-cation pamphlet explaining what was done differently.

I doubt it'll be TI, but I hope it is, would be easier to maintain.
User avatar
sal
Member
Posts: 17042
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Golden, Colorado USA

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#30

Post by sal »

Liquid Cobra wrote:Sal, is the 52100 UKPK idea still on the table?
Now that we have a source for sheet, it becomes more of a possibility.

sal
ohcyclist
Member
Posts: 494
Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 11:25 pm

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#31

Post by ohcyclist »

Count me in as well. That makes commitments at 7 or 8 so far.
VashHash
Member
Posts: 4839
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:49 pm
Location: Louisiana

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#32

Post by VashHash »

I'll take #11 never tried this steel so it would be interesting to see what it does.
WorkingEdge
Member
Posts: 209
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 1:35 am

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#33

Post by WorkingEdge »

How does 52100 compare to something like Cruwear?
Regardless, I'd like one as well.
aesmith
Member
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 10:50 am
Location: Scotland

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#34

Post by aesmith »

Liquid Cobra wrote:Sal, is the 52100 UKPK idea still on the table?
Here's hoping ..
---------
Tony S
dogrunner
Member
Posts: 900
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:00 pm

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#35

Post by dogrunner »

Mili in 52100 - Yes!
Great steel for a hard working knife. The 52100 blades I have, including the Mule, are all fixed blades.
Would prefer G10 by far! Ti is more expensive and heavier. Spyderco G10 is a very durable, grippy handle that is very useable in cold temps where Ti or any metal handle sucks the heat out of my hand even through mittens. Plus, one of the great features of the Mili is the amount of cutting edge you get at a light and easy carry weight. I have no problem with heavier folders (Tuff is one of my favorites), but this is the Mili!
Color - don't care at all. Prefer something different than other milis.

Great news! So, when is this going to happen :)
User avatar
Ankerson
Member
Posts: 6929
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#36

Post by Ankerson »

WorkingEdge wrote:How does 52100 compare to something like Cruwear?
Regardless, I'd like one as well.

Under normal use it should do well at the target hardness range of 62-63.

Shouldn't roll much and will be easy to sharpen.
sbaker345
Member
Posts: 310
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:32 pm

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#37

Post by sbaker345 »

dogrunner wrote:Mili in 52100 - Yes!
Great steel for a hard working knife. The 52100 blades I have, including the Mule, are all fixed blades.
Would prefer G10 by far! Ti is more expensive and heavier. Spyderco G10 is a very durable, grippy handle that is very useable in cold temps where Ti or any metal handle sucks the heat out of my hand even through mittens. Plus, one of the great features of the Mili is the amount of cutting edge you get at a light and easy carry weight. I have no problem with heavier folders (Tuff is one of my favorites), but this is the Mili!
Color - don't care at all. Prefer something different than other milis.

Great news! So, when is this going to happen :)

I find TI to not be especially thermal conductive. I've had even g10 burn my hand before but TI hasn't so far.
User avatar
JNewell
Member
Posts: 5060
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Land of the Bean and the Cod

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#38

Post by JNewell »

Sal, as a reference, do you have records on what the HRC range for the MT01 was?
User avatar
senorsquare
Member
Posts: 1531
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:34 am
Location: Lotta Rock, AR

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#39

Post by senorsquare »

sal wrote:...Mostly because I wanted one in 52100 as a work knife on the mountain. I figured you and Joe would probably want one as well. So we have 3. We'll make 1000...

sal
Another reason I love this brand.

Count me in for one. I was planning to track down a Cruwear model, but I reckon I'll wait for a 52100 instead.
Cujobob
Member
Posts: 844
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:26 pm

Re: Optimal hardness for 52100

#40

Post by Cujobob »

I don't think 52100 and cruwear are anything alike. Or am I wrong?
Post Reply