S35VN vs. S30V

Discuss Spyderco's products and history.
Cliff Stamp
Member
Posts: 3852
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#21

Post by Cliff Stamp »

Bill1170 wrote:I was under the impression that S35VN is a powder metallurgy steel.
Note that PM steels only refers to one aspect of steel making, it replaces essentially the final casting. The steel still has to go through all the standard methods to mix the alloy, remove impurities, etc. . It is liquid in those stages. PM steels are also processed in the normal way after the HIP, usually cross rolled (or often) because it minimizes anisotropy which is one of the main advantages of PM steels (the have very similar properties when measured along all axis).
Bill1170
Member
Posts: 2785
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: San Diego North County

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#22

Post by Bill1170 »

I see, I think. The niobium carbides make the melt ropy during the molten processing because the foundry can't keep it hot enough to keep them from segregating?
Cliff Stamp
Member
Posts: 3852
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#23

Post by Cliff Stamp »

The solubility is quite low in austenite even at high temperatures, hence niobium carbide comes out quite early and causes issues with the basic forming processes of pouring or atomizing. More information than you likely ever wanted to know about niobium and vanadium in steels :

- http://www.kau.se/sites/default/files/D ... _18759.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
The Mastiff
Member
Posts: 5951
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:53 am
Location: raleigh nc

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#24

Post by The Mastiff »

Thanks for the explanation and PDF Cliff. You find some interesting reading materials.

Joe
Bill1170
Member
Posts: 2785
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: San Diego North County

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#25

Post by Bill1170 »

Yes, thank you, Cliff. Fascinating stuff there. That catastrophic oxidation of the 20 mm cubes was impressive.
User avatar
Ankerson
Member
Posts: 6929
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:23 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re:

#26

Post by Ankerson »

rnbtexas wrote:Sorry I know this post is from a while ago, I'm just curious the general feeling out there and don't want to start a new thread. According to some reviews I've been reading S35VN isn't upto the same par as S30V. Since it has been out a while now does anyone one have input on this?

I have been very impressed with S35VN in the later knives I have tested, that's the Native 5, Sebenza 25 and a Custom that I use in the kitchen currently.

Seems the makers have really started to get the HT protocols down and that's a good thing.

S35VN can be pushed into the higher HRC ranges, something that I said from the beginning and some of the Custom makers are in fact doing just that and with excellent results. The kitchen knife I have is 62.5 HRC, .006" behind the edge and the performance is excellent both in testing and real world use.
Tony18
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:00 am
Location: Chicago IL

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#27

Post by Tony18 »

glbpro wrote:
Blerv wrote:They are almost interchangeable.
I would concur with this, now that I have corrected the edge geometry on my Native 5LW! This knife is definitely the worst-ground USA-made Spydie I've had to date: all of my others (Millie, PM2, Manix 2LW) have had very symmetrical grinds and nicely centred tips, this knife had neither. Must have been made on a Friday afternoon :rolleyes:

Bruno
So I'm not the only one, I can't believe how bad mine is. It's literally almost a single bevel.
User avatar
Blerv
Member
Posts: 11833
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:24 am

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#28

Post by Blerv »

Tony18 wrote:So I'm not the only one, I can't believe how bad mine is. It's literally almost a single bevel.
I would have to think it's uncommon or even rare but certainly not impossible.

I've had plenty of odd grinds on Spydies before. Very seldom they aren't functionally very sharp. It's what you get when you sharpen most your blades by hand on power belts, even by skilled folks. I'm guessing the Native5 soon will be set-up to be sharpened by automatons (robots). Maybe it is already and it's a factor of fine tuning the calibration.

Nonetheless...people sharpening a ton of blades per day tend to have a bell curve of results. If you turn down the number of blades produced per day the quality (or consistency) tends to increase along with price. Although, my guess is the consistency isn't increased by 400%.
Cliff Stamp
Member
Posts: 3852
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#29

Post by Cliff Stamp »

Blerv wrote: Nonetheless...people sharpening a ton of blades per day tend to have a bell curve of results.
Indeed, however what is unfortunate for manufacturers is that the reported statistics don't follow the same curve. Even though the defects may be unlikely the probability of them being reported is much more likely hence why polling for experiences can often produced a skewed perception. The more extreme the performance the more likely it is to get reported.
User avatar
glbpro
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:26 pm
Location: Singapore
Contact:

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#30

Post by glbpro »

Blerv wrote:I would have to think it's uncommon or even rare but certainly not impossible.

I've had plenty of odd grinds on Spydies before. Very seldom they aren't functionally very sharp.
So have I, but never from the USA factory. What's more unusual is that I went through all of the pieces in the shop and this was the best one that I could find! Presumably they are still getting used to grinding this relatively new design...

Bruno
Cliff Stamp
Member
Posts: 3852
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#31

Post by Cliff Stamp »

As a side note, when you do get a knife with an obvious defect, even if you don't want a replacement/refund, it benefits to email/contact customer service and let them know. If Spyderco isn't aware of a problem then they can't fix it.
User avatar
glbpro
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:26 pm
Location: Singapore
Contact:

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#32

Post by glbpro »

Yes Cliff I agree. However, I believe that it's important not to be too picky, especially when it comes to production knives. If the knife is supplied sharp and with a fully functional lock off centre tips and slightly asymmetrical grinds can be forgiven.

I remember Eric saying in a video that when blades are ground by hand there is usually a variation of a degree or so from spec, and this can be quite easy to see even though it has no impact on the knife's cutting ability.
Max1966
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 1:11 pm

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#33

Post by Max1966 »

Hello everybody, I am new to the forum but believe I may have useful knowledge and experience to contribute. I hope you find my posts beneficial.

To answer the S35VN vs. S30V question: you would have to have two identical knives with two identical blades (other than the steel) and test them repeatedly to get a scientific result. That may not happen.

Also, the manner in which they are sharpened is critical, as you would also need the same edge profile on both knives, to a microscopic level. Which would prove difficult.

So, we generally rely on personal experience with different knives, with different edge profiles, to make a comparison. Hardly scientific but possibly useful.

I own a Mora Companion 860MG Stainless Steel Bushcraft Knife with a Sandvik 12C27 stainless steel blade, that IMHO chips too easily. I also have an "unbranded" S30V knife that is perfectly good as a kitchen knife but not what I would use as a utility nor EDC knife, because (again IMHO) the edge is prone to small chips.

I do own a Chris Reeves small Inkosi with the S35VN steel blade. This is what I call a proper universal EDC. The blade takes an edge, keeps it, does not chip (unless you over-sharpen) and can be gently brought back to a great edge if blunted.

I will throw my hat in the ring for S35VN. It is better, and also more expensive.

Blade profile, edge profile and careful honing probably make more difference than the inherent superiority of S35VN over S30V, and 12C27.
twinboysdad
Member
Posts: 3719
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:23 pm

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#34

Post by twinboysdad »

[quote="Max1966"]

To answer the S35VN vs. S30V question: you would have to have two identical knives with two identical blades (other than the steel) and test them repeatedly to get a scientific result. /quote]

1. Welcome here
2. Good input
3. To the best I can tell, only the PM2 was offered in both S30V and S35V, and assuming a sharpening system like Wicked Edge for uniformity, this is a possible expirament
EmperorMA
Member
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 6:44 pm

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#35

Post by EmperorMA »

Max1966 wrote:Hello everybody, I am new to the forum but believe I may have useful knowledge and experience to contribute. I hope you find my posts beneficial.

To answer the S35VN vs. S30V question: you would have to have two identical knives with two identical blades (other than the steel) and test them repeatedly to get a scientific result. That may not happen.

Also, the manner in which they are sharpened is critical, as you would also need the same edge profile on both knives, to a microscopic level. Which would prove difficult.

So, we generally rely on personal experience with different knives, with different edge profiles, to make a comparison. Hardly scientific but possibly useful.

I own a Mora Companion 860MG Stainless Steel Bushcraft Knife with a Sandvik 12C27 stainless steel blade, that IMHO chips too easily. I also have an "unbranded" S30V knife that is perfectly good as a kitchen knife but not what I would use as a utility nor EDC knife, because (again IMHO) the edge is prone to small chips.

I do own a Chris Reeves small Inkosi with the S35VN steel blade. This is what I call a proper universal EDC. The blade takes an edge, keeps it, does not chip (unless you over-sharpen) and can be gently brought back to a great edge if blunted.

I will throw my hat in the ring for S35VN. It is better, and also more expensive.

Blade profile, edge profile and careful honing probably make more difference than the inherent superiority of S35VN over S30V, and 12C27.
Really not fair to compare the other knives you mention above to a Chris Reeves knife.

"Unnamed S30V" vs Chris Reeves S35VN is kind of like Yugo vs Ferrari.

Compare Chris Reeves small Inkosi in S35VN vs same in S30V.
Wishlist: Delica 4 FFG VG10, Manix 2 LW XHP, Military 204P and S110V, Para 3 Cruwear and S110V, Paramilitary 2 (all versions), SpydieChef LC200N, Caribbean PE and Sheepsfoot SE

Procured: Caly 3.5 VG10, Dragonfly 2 LW VG10, Manix 2 XL S30V, Native 5 LW S110V, Para 3 S30V, Paramilitary 2 S110V
Max1966
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 1:11 pm

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#36

Post by Max1966 »

Cliff Stamp wrote:
Bill1170 wrote:I was under the impression that S35VN is a powder metallurgy steel.
Note that PM steels only refers to one aspect of steel making, it replaces essentially the final casting. The steel still has to go through all the standard methods to mix the alloy, remove impurities, etc. . It is liquid in those stages. PM steels are also processed in the normal way after the HIP, usually cross rolled (or often) because it minimizes anisotropy which is one of the main advantages of PM steels (the have very similar properties when measured along all axis).
Yes, S35VN is a PM steel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPM_S30V_steel

As I mentioned, this is a performance/price consideration. My Moraknive cost £15 and the small Inkosi £300. Is the Inkosi 20x better? No. The price difference is not in the utility of the knife but the engineering, artistry and overall quality. Baked beans and caviar :)

From my experience, S35VN is just that bit better than S30V at resisting "chipping" and just that little bit easier to hone. Other than that, I can't tell the difference in everyday use.

twinboysdad - I don't have the time, but if you do that experiment, please post the results!

EmporerMA - you are right, I may get a small Sebanza to compare, but they have different blade profiles.
Max1966
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 1:11 pm

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#37

Post by Max1966 »

Ah, looks like Chris Reeves have dropped S30V?
User avatar
dreadpirate
Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 10:42 pm

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#38

Post by dreadpirate »

I have always wondered why Spyderco does not make more S35VN knives. Mostly S30V and VG10.
fanglekai
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 10:53 am

Re: S35VN vs. S30V

#39

Post by fanglekai »

Max1966 wrote:Ah, looks like Chris Reeves have dropped S30V?
Years ago.
Post Reply