It seems like almost everyone wants the holes, so now we have to figure out how many! I really thought the poll would have been more even. Sal said it was about 50/50.Liquid Cobra wrote:4 holes please.
Matt
It seems like almost everyone wants the holes, so now we have to figure out how many! I really thought the poll would have been more even. Sal said it was about 50/50.Liquid Cobra wrote:4 holes please.
I'm sure we'll all love it no matter what the final version looks like, holes or not. I just feel that the majority of us think the ATR needs the holes to truly be an ATR. I trust Sal. :DLiquid Cobra wrote:Well maybe our opinion will change once we see the holeless version shown at the A'dam meet.
Last week it was pretty hard making it until Sunday, this week is worse. I'll have to do a better job teaching my kids patience than my parents did with me.ManixFan wrote:Would like to see a G-10 version........with or without holes (reserve my judgment until I see the Amsterdam pics) and the slimmer hood
Yes agree. I much prefer the less cluttered look of the Ti ATR with its fewer holes compared to the shotgun massacre that is the VG10 SS version. :)spydieh0le wrote:One hole per finger. So 4!
I certainly hope not, those divots on the Tuff were a real turn off for me........ugly as ****.spyderHS08 wrote:Framelock G10 ATR with Tuff/lil temp style divets(holes) in the G10?? Anyone?? :D
As for the OP's question....it's gotta have some holes to be an ATR.
Radioactive thanks for supplying the photo. After thinking about it for a moment with the photo handy, how about four holes for a clean look but larger than the four in the original?RadioactiveSpyder wrote:The SS ones do have 6 big holes, but also those 5 little ones too...
An ATR without holes is like a Spyderco blade without a hole, blasphemous! :D. Cheers, Radioactive :)
I feel exactly the same way Matt>> Because when they brought back the "R" model in a completely different style and format it really turned me off. If you're going to do a Sprint Run of an older classic model they do it the way it was originally intended for crying out loud.MattM68 wrote:I'm sure we'll all love it no matter what the final version looks like, holes or not. I just feel that the majority of us think the ATR needs the holes to truly be an ATR.Liquid Cobra wrote:Well maybe our opinion will change once we see the holeless version shown at the A'dam meet.
I can understand this position. If I had fallen in love with the skeletonized handle R, I probably would have been disappointed when the Nishijin version was announced since it was such a departure. However, having gone the other way, I can see now how I have two different options for the R, each with the same ergos but with a unique feel. I think it's a good thing, truth be told. However, I also voted for holes in the G10 to harken back to the old ATR, even if they're smaller and don't serve to lighten the handle much.JD Spydo wrote:I feel exactly the same way Matt>> Because when they brought back the "R" model in a completely different style and format it really turned me off. If you're going to do a Sprint Run of an older classic model they do it the way it was originally intended for crying out loud.
And I would also prefer that they do the Titanium ATR instead of the stainless handled version. The ATR is another great one from the GOLDEN ERA of SPYDERS.
It's not so much that I have an intense love of skeletonized handles as much as it is to keep it as it was originally intended. Because when they did the "R" late on with a solid handle it just made it a completely different model all together>> and one I didn't like at all .tvenuto wrote:I can understand this position. If I had fallen in love with the skeletonized handle R, I probably would have been disappointed when the Nishijin version was announced since it was such a departure. However, having gone the other way, I can see now how I have two different options for the R, each with the same ergos but with a unique feel. I think it's a good thing, truth be told. However, I also voted for holes in the G10 to harken back to the old ATR, even if they're smaller and don't serve to lighten the handle much.JD Spydo wrote:I feel exactly the same way Matt>> Because when they brought back the "R" model in a completely different style and format it really turned me off. If you're going to do a Sprint Run of an older classic model they do it the way it was originally intended for crying out loud.
And I would also prefer that they do the Titanium ATR instead of the stainless handled version. The ATR is another great one from the GOLDEN ERA of SPYDERS.
I see what you're saying as I said. I don't have the original R, but I do have the second version with the skeletonized handle and solid blade. What I'm saying is that I do like the nishijin version even though they're different knives, and I probably only discovered this because I got the nishijin one first. Maybe some view peel ply G10 as an improvement in material like you viewed the change in the Ayoob as positive?JD Spydo wrote:It's not so much that I have an intense love of skeletonized handles as much as it is to keep it as it was originally intended. Because when they did the "R" late on with a solid handle it just made it a completely different model all together>> and one I didn't like at all .
And that original "R" was such a brilliant piece of work and was done so much better than even any of those "Q" models that it just stood out in a class all by itself. And "tvenuto" if you ever owned or got to check out the original "R" fist hand I think you would immediately see where I'm coming from. Now concerning the holes in a Sprint Run of the ATR>>> again I always want to see Sprint Runs either like they were to begin with which gave them their initial appeal and popularity. Or in another objective viewpoint as in the case of the Sprint Ayoob they used a far better handle material than was used on the original which made me even love the more so. Vast improvement or making it an even far better model that it was originally I'm always in favor of>> especially if it's going to be a user.
I've always thought that the clip off the old GUNTING model would be ideal for the Ti ATR. As far as wire clips go I've yet to find one I like as much as I do on my user Dodo model.PayneTrain wrote:Keep the holes. I like the pattern in the stainless version a lot, though the Ti version is a little more subdued and may appeal to more.
And yes, as for the old clip, destroy it. Burn it. Bury it. Then bomb it. Then disavow any knowledge that it ever existed, and create a secret society to ensure no one ever finds out the truth. Finally, add a wire clip.